My opinion is that it depends on the group. I never really considered the White Stripes that punk, but the Jesus and Mary Chain's Psycho Candy still sounds ragin' to me all these years later. Any other opinions out there?
Permalink Reply by Sean on December 28, 2011 at 1:46pm The Cramps managed to pull it off. They sold out, admitted it, but still stayed the same kick ass band. Same with The Ramones. I think The Ramones are the best example of a Punk group becoming one of the most popular and well known Punk groups of all time, but were still a "Punk" group and never changed their ways or style. Their songs did manage to get a bit Poppy over the years, but it wasn't complete shit like how most bands end up.
Permalink Reply by Bobby on December 28, 2011 at 1:50pm
Permalink Reply by dave on December 28, 2011 at 1:53pm Excellent examples! Too bad they couldn't make more $, but they stayed true to their roots...
Sean said:
The Cramps managed to pull it off. They sold out, admitted it, but still stayed the same kick ass band. Same with The Ramones. I think The Ramones are the best example of a Punk group becoming one of the most popular and well known Punk groups of all time, but were still a "Punk" group and never changed their ways or style. Their songs did manage to get a bit Poppy over the years, but it wasn't complete shit like how most bands end up.
Permalink Reply by Sam Sinister on December 28, 2011 at 4:26pm Wow, what a tired old argument/discussion... no disrespect to the OP, but this is really a breeding ground for silly arguments. My opinion? Punk is a style of music, the style doesn't change when notoriety and/or money enter the equation. You either play it or you don't.
Permalink Reply by Retroman68 on December 29, 2011 at 3:47am Just look at Billy Childish, he's more punk than anyone and still plays the same music, same chords and same riffs as he did at the start, he's extremely well known without being famous....his choice!

Permalink Reply by robert mendoza on December 29, 2011 at 5:56pm as opinions are like assholes, "everyone has one". this one would like to add; in the end it really depends on who, and how long, you would like to support a given artist or musician...i.e. Clash/Ramones/Iggy/Cramps. every one has to make a living. i would prefer one to have success during their lifetime not after they are dead. i think Mr. Childish hit upon this with the line: "and Joe Stummer's turning over in his grave"!!!
Sam Sinister said:
Wow, what a tired old argument/discussion... no disrespect to the OP, but this is really a breeding ground for silly arguments. My opinion? Punk is a style of music, the style doesn't change when notoriety and/or money enter the equation. You either play it or you don't.
Permalink Reply by Sam Sinister on December 29, 2011 at 10:37pm What a lot of the "anti-mainstream" sect of punk rockers fail to realize most of the time is, all of those groups (Clash/Ramones/Iggy/Cramps, etc.) strove to achieve commercial success in their lifetimes, but didn't have much luck. Or they just had really bad marketing teams at their record labels. Or the record labels didn't know how to market them.

Permalink Reply by melissa scott on January 19, 2012 at 11:49pm Hey Sam: well, you kinda nailed the silly argument thang on its head. But, it also depends if you think that Punk is just a style of music, or, if it's something else. And THAT depends on personal opinion and experience. I don't see Punk as just one among many styles of music. Maybe that's the difference between listening to punk, and being a Punk.
Sam Sinister said:
Wow, what a tired old argument/discussion... no disrespect to the OP, but this is really a breeding ground for silly arguments. My opinion? Punk is a style of music, the style doesn't change when notoriety and/or money enter the equation. You either play it or you don't.
Permalink Reply by John Battles on May 13, 2012 at 8:29pm If we're to decide , for ourselves , whether Punk is a style of music or an attitude (I know , I'm tired of that word , too....), or if it is/was a cultural movement , or , all of the above ,then we also need to consider, has Punk taken itself too seriously , or not seriously enough? Or , I'd wager , both.....I was talking with a younger guy about The MOJO and Uncut special "Punk"issues , released concurrently. He asked me how far the features went , time wise. I said , you know , around '79 , '80 . when it started to go away."WHEN IT STARTED TO GO AWAY?!!!!" , he said , "THIS IS A WAY OF LIFE !!!!". Of course , he was too young to have heard the word on everybody's lips , "PUNK IS DEAD". Not that we cared , in the 80's . If it's good music , which is one of two kinds , you can enjoy it before and after the revival starts. That said who's to say Leadbelly , John Cage , Screamin' Jay Hawkins , and other , more blatantly obvious examples , like Link Wray , are'nt also Punk?
Permalink Reply by Sam Sinister on May 13, 2012 at 8:37pm When people say that punk ended in the late '70s/early '80s, I always assume that they only find their music from mainstream sources...
Permalink Reply by John Battles on June 15, 2012 at 1:08am That's true in a lot of cases , but , a lot of people who were there , either playing music or going to gigs, in the mid to late 70's , will say the same thing , that it ran out of steam , but morphed into Post punk , Early 80's UK Punk and American HC....The younger guy I was talking to , he was way more into the early 80's British stuff than I am. There were still bands doing more or less what they'd done 5 or 6 years earlier , but , it would have been like doing Glam Rock in 1978.
Sam Sinister said:
When people say that punk ended in the late '70s/early '80s, I always assume that they only find their music from mainstream sources...
Permalink Reply by John Battles on June 15, 2012 at 1:21am I just remember that The Clash were very popular , at least , toward the end. They had a top - charting LP , two big hits on the radio and on MTV , and one earlier hit back in rotation. They were playing bigger concerts and ginormous festivals. Of course , that all lasted little over a year.
When Mick Jones got the sack , Strummer carried on like the band was going to get back to square one. Virtually no one admits to liking the resulting album , but , I've been told the revamped lineup was'nt bad, live. Of course , by '82 , the accusations of selling out were on everybody's lips. "Combat Rock" lacked direction , but , I did'nt think there was a hit , there. The album as a whole hardly sounds like a sellout. I saw them on that tour , and they brought the rock.
Hodads from Hell posted a status
TINGLERZ posted a photo
TINGLERZ posted a status
whatwave dave replied to whatwave dave's discussion Radio What Wave from London, Ontario Canada... in the group Zines & Radio ShowsAdded by Glenn Peart 9 Comments 0 Likes
Ning networks aren't free! We rely heavily on member donations and banner ad sales to cover the hosting costs of this site. So if you like being a part of it, please donate a few bucks using the link above. Thanks!
© 2013 Created by kopper.
Powered by
